← Search

Kay Almer

Renton, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
331 matches · 170W–161L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.52
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 40 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
39%
down to 3.5
61%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 23% down · 77% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.56. Higher than today’s 3.52 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Renton · 4.0
11 of 14
WA · 4.0
690 of 782

Kay is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kay has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kay has gone from the 18th to the 5th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.5
63%
34W–20L · 52.6% of games
4.0
43.1%
44W–58L · 45.5% of games
6.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.3% of games
7.0
59.5%
22W–15L · 53.7% of games
8.0
33.3%
15W–30L · 45.3% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 49.9% of games
8.0mixed
48.4%
15W–16L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history331 matches
L
Cat Zhang / Isabella Hashimoto
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Hei
+0.010about as expected — took 43% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Martin
−0.003below expectation — took 28% of games against 35% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Felton
−0.044below expectation — took 37% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vicki Moll
+0.029better than expected — took 50% of games against 38% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Maison
+0.003about as expected — took 40% of games against 40% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Shimizu
+0.004about as expected — took 46% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
Logan Baxter / Jenalyn Bush
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Luk
−0.007below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vicki Moll
+0.030better than expected — took 58% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chantal Tran
+0.014about as expected — took 40% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Cassandra Johnston / Heather Seeley
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Noon
+0.019better than expected — took 58% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Eidsaune
+0.046better than expected — took 43% of games against 29% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-03-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Smith
+0.001below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.