Search

Andrea Noon

Kent, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
46 matches · 20W–26L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.69
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.0
381 of 782

Andrea is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Andrea has been a steady 4.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Andrea has gone from the 27th to the 62nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
40%
12W–18L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history46 matches
L
Bally Bang / J Coifmanmixed
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aaron Haffner
+0.000better than expected — took 48% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Dan Kalish / Una Leemixed
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edgar Ramirez Diaz
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Fan
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Fan
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Namchee Chan / Toru Minomixed
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edgar Ramirez Diaz
+0.000below expectation — took 28% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
Jenalyn Bush / Melissa Stratman
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leila Ramirez-noon
+0.014better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gemma Gimpes
0.010better than expected — took 100% of games against 87% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Chen
+0.033better than expected — took 62% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Chen
+0.025better than expected — took 47% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Emily Barrett / Mohini Vembusubramanian
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mutsumi Locklear
0.018below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Chen
+0.016better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Yamamoto
+0.028better than expected — took 43% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.