Search

Mayret Talonia

Sammamish, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
48 matches · 31W–17L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.11
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
8%
stay 3.0
92%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 49% stay · 51% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.00. Lower than today’s 3.11 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sammamish · 3.0
5 of 38
WA · 3.0
104 of 1107

Mayret is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mayret has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Mayret has gone from the 52nd to the 70th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
70.4%
19W–8L · 56.6% of games
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 48.3% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jagbir Singh
+0.000below expectation — took 42% of games against 50% expected
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Christie Cabrera / Jennifer Eng
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linlin Yang
0.022below expectation — took 55% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Nicole Hardie / Victoria Szydlowski
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nan Li
+0.018about as expected — took 38% of games against 35% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nan Li
+0.008about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nan Li
+0.009about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Cassie Davis / Riley Beirne
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nirasha Ramchurren
0.028below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Tanja Omeze
2026-02-21 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.051better than expected — took 61% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 5-3
L
2026-02-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Cheng
0.012below expectation — took 43% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Anita Lemieux
2026-01-24 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.020better than expected — took 46% of games against 41% expected
6-7
W
2026-01-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nan Li
+0.033better than expected — took 62% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Sasha Moinzadeh / Tara Verburg
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nan Li
+0.040better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gabi Ifrim
0.019below expectation — took 58% of games against 64% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.