Teams

PSC-Cheng

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.23 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesZhe Li / Jing Li vs Darci Wyman / Sally Revere2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSanda Morea vs Lisa Perry3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNan Li / Mengye Guo vs Toby Miller / Kristin Nierenberg1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLingqing Wang / Gabi Ifrim vs Diana Vecchio / Trisna Tanus6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2026-02-27vs MI-Crush It-LeeLost 13
L#1 DoublesMonica Boris / Irina Petriuc vs CECI BISSONNETTE / Janine Perret1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesGiuliana Guilherme vs Laura Walsh0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGabi Ifrim / Sanda Morea vs Melissa Cahoon / Beth Garr2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLingqing Wang / Nellie Jie vs Angelisa Paladin / Elizabeth Evans6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-21vs AYTC-Busby 3.5WWon 31
L#1 DoublesZhe Li / Jing Li vs Katie Busby / Christina Kim1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMayret Talonia vs Tanja Omeze6-4, 5-3
W#2 DoublesMonica Boris / Brenda Cheng vs Jen Pham-Corbett / Erin McMonigal6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNan Li / Lingqing Wang vs Emily Trenkner-Jones / Heather Bauer6-2, 7-5
2026-02-14vs CP-TNT-SikkaLost 13
L#1 DoublesLingqing Wang / Zhe Li vs Karen Choi / Jessica Zhi6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSanda Morea vs Mary Jean Waite0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNellie Jie / Gabi Ifrim vs Hedi Carpenter / Xiaoyi Ye3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGiuliana Guilherme / Mengye Guo vs Tessa Chen / Mallica Sikka4-6, 5-7
2026-02-06vs NTC-Net Assets-EllisonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesZhe Li / Jing Li vs Kim Scott / Sara Burgess6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSanda Morea vs Isabelle Ochsner0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBrenda Cheng / Mayret Talonia vs Sue Thompson / Gabriela Beisel2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGabi Ifrim / Lingqing Wang vs Jodi Cagnina / Holly Norris6-1, 6-2
2026-01-31vs MC-Spice Gals-KimLost 04
L#1 DoublesMonica Boris / Brenda Cheng vs Min Park / Jennifer Chu6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCelia Zhu vs Patty Graves3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNan Li / Jing Li vs Ellen Acuario / Donna Kim2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNellie Jie / Irina Petriuc vs Priscilla Yow / Karla Franco4-6, 4-6
2026-01-24vs BAIN-MinerLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrenda Cheng / Nan Li vs Jackie Osland / Amanda Bast1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMayret Talonia vs Anita Lemieux6-7
L#2 DoublesIrina Petriuc / Gabi Ifrim vs Erica Wiechers / Emily Wooton3-6, 0-6
2026-01-16vs WSC-Woodinville Wonder Women-GaiWon 31
W#1 DoublesJing Li / Brenda Cheng vs Tammi Walker / Lena Peter6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCelia Zhu vs Deanne Angell6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNan Li / Mayret Talonia vs Darlene Jones / Kathleen Gilkey7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGabi Ifrim / Irina Petriuc vs Suzanne Monson / Kitty Close4-6, 5-7
2026-01-11vs BC-Happy Spicy-ParkWon 31
L#1 DoublesMonica Boris / Irina Petriuc vs Tricie Hunter / Kim Smallwood1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCelia Zhu vs Jingjing Cai4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJing Li / Zhe Li vs Alice Kirkwood / Adina Friedman6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNan Li / Mayret Talonia vs Sasha Moinzadeh / Tara Verburg6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Zhe Li
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.33
Celia Zhu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Jing Li
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.17
Monica Boris
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Lingqing Wang
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
Brenda Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.06
Nan Li
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Giuliana Guilherme
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.94
Mayret Talonia
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.86
Irina Petriuc
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Nellie Jie
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.83
Mengye Guo
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.77
Gabi Ifrim
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.68
Sanda Morea
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Luisa Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luisa Brown + Monica Boris5357% games+12.3% vs expected
Nan Li + Mayret Talonia7358% games+9.3% vs expected
Brenda Cheng + Monica Boris3258% games+5.8% vs expected
Luisa Brown + Irina Petriuc2445% games+3.9% vs expected
Gabi Ifrim + Mayret Talonia6352% games+3.4% vs expected
Lingqing Wang + Brenda Cheng3258% games+3.0% vs expected
Lingqing Wang + Nan Li7660% games+2.0% vs expected
Irina Petriuc + Monica Boris5253% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Zhe Li
41W–23L career · type S · 11 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Celia Zhu
77W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Jing Li
47W–31L career · 8 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Monica Boris
75W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Lingqing Wang
68W–58L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Brenda Cheng
58W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Nan Li
62W–60L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Giuliana Guilherme
11W–7L career · type D · 9 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Mayret Talonia
34W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Irina Petriuc
68W–77L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Nellie Jie
41W–42L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Mengye Guo
6W–11L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Gabi Ifrim
51W–95L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Sanda Morea
41W–72L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Luisa Brown
20W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.