← Search

Gabriela Beisel

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
83 matches · 32W–51L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.32
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
119 of 256
WA · 3.5
504 of 1209

Gabriela is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gabriela has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Gabriela has gone from the 80th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
36.9%
24W–41L · 46.7% of games
7.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Norris
+0.013better than expected — took 53% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Thompson
+0.011about as expected — took 38% of games against 36% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Brenda Cheng / Mayret Talonia
2026-02-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Thompson
+0.024better than expected — took 57% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Nely Koralska / Xiaoyi Ye
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marybeth Alwood
−0.009below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Tanja Omeze / Rachel Stroble
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Thompson
−0.023below expectation — took 45% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Gilbert
−0.011below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Elise Hooper / Karla Sperber
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Thompson
+0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Pawitri Price / Cathy Skeen
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Scott
+0.028better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Isabelle Ochsner
+0.002about as expected — took 60% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Denise Braza / Wendy Sowers
2025-09-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Beaudoin
−0.014below expectation — took 32% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Sandoval
−0.028below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-09-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laine Meadows
+0.009about as expected — took 44% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 3-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.