← Search

Karla Sperber

Renton, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 134W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karla Sperber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history213 matches
L
2026-08-09 · AYTC-Mystery Machine-Miller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Zlateff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · AYTC-Mystery Machine-Miller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Zlateff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · AYTC-Mystery Machine-Miller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Liu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · Millertime · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Apostolou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · Millertime · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Apostolou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · AYTC-Mystery Machine-Miller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ted Schneider mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-11 · Millertime · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toby Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · AYTC-Mystery Machine-Miller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chiyo Lai mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · AYTC-Mystery Machine-Miller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Zlateff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · NTC-Eat Play Love-Vecchio/Wyman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miri Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · NTC-Eat Play Love-Vecchio/Wyman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miri Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · NTC-Eat Play Love-Vecchio/Wyman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Revere
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
72%
72W–28L · 56.7% of games
4.0
40%
16W–24L · 43.3% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 70.7% of games
7.0mixed
65%
26W–14L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
51 matches
#2 Singles
7%
14 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova