← Search

Matthew Day

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 113W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Matthew Day to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history188 matches
L
2026-07-26 · TCSP-Lampitt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Day mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-17 · TCSP-Lampitt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Day mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-10 · TCSP-Lampitt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Day mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-28 · TCSP-Lampitt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Day mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-20 · TCSP-Lampitt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Day mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-28 · TCSP-Parrish · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Nickel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-15 · TCSP-Parrish · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · TCSP-Parrish · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Warden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-26 · NTC-Smack-Steinwinder · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Lindburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-18 · TCSP-Cougars Fall 2025-Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-10-05 · TCSP-Cougars Fall 2025-Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-04 · NTC-Smack-Steinwinder · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian MacDuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
61%
25W–16L · 54.5% of games
3.5
68.2%
45W–21L · 57% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 53.6% of games
7.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 54.6% of games
8.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 57% of games
6.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 57.5% of games
7.0mixed
31.2%
10W–22L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
22 matches
#1 Singles
7%
13 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Male Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal