Search

Jingjing Cai

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
111 matches · 54W–57L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.21
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.5
64 of 96
WA · 3.5
843 of 1209

Jingjing is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jingjing has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jingjing has gone from the 32nd to the 47th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 61.3% of games
3.5
44.4%
36W–45L · 48% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history111 matches
W
Jamie Schroeder / Rebecca Robbins
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Cecil-Moore
+0.056better than expected — took 59% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
ANN MOLITOR / Gabby Klingman
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Cecil-Moore
+0.027better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason LeeKeenan
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Cecil-Moore
+0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason LeeKeenan
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 38% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Sarah Barnes / Kate Kennedy
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Yoon
+0.076better than expected — took 100% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Teanen Chen / Sienna Rice
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Yoon
0.005about as expected — took 47% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Una Lee / Angelisa Paladin
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Cecil-Moore
0.004below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Kelly Medzegian / Ella Odland
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miye Moriguchi
+0.003below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Park
+0.001about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Sarika Calla / Christine Garnett
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hsu
0.023about as expected — took 63% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hsu
0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.