Search

Jamie Schroeder

EDMONDS, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
51 matches · 27W–24L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.5
584 of 1460

Jamie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jamie has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jamie has gone from the 53rd to the 55th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
56.2%
18W–14L · 51.8% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 32.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history51 matches
L
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Robbins
0.062below expectation — took 41% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Sarah Barnes / Kim Schmanke
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
+0.004better than expected — took 80% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
+0.008better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
0.033below expectation — took 47% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 4-6
L
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Combs
0.005about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Myrna Alquiza / Emily Claflin
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
0.055below expectation — took 52% of games against 71% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Kiera Kim / Ali Jones
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Combs
0.018below expectation — took 55% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Theresa Maloney / Kelly Medzegian
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
+0.029better than expected — took 60% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Yifei Sun / Harold Wuchamps
2026-03-21 · #1 Mixed Doubles · with Scott Marcus
0.023below expectation — took 40% of games against 51% expected
6-4
W
Sarah Lu / Connie Sun
2026-03-07 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Chen
+0.090better than expected — took 100% of games against 51% expected
6-0
W
2026-02-07 · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
+0.147better than expected — took 60% of games against 29% expected
6-4
L
Jenn Lee / Caitlin Baker
2026-01-10 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Chen
0.050below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.