Search

Myrna Alquiza

Kent, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
151 matches · 70W–81L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.09
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
12%
down to 3.0
88%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 8% down · 92% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.11. Higher than today’s 3.09 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kent · 3.5
13 of 13
WA · 3.5
1117 of 1209

Myrna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Myrna has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Myrna has gone from the 60th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
45.1%
46W–56L · 48.8% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 53.5% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
10W–12L · 50.1% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history151 matches
L
KC Mattingly-Nelson / Jamie Schroeder
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Claflin
+0.046better than expected — took 48% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Booth
+0.003about as expected — took 43% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erika Sagle
+0.002about as expected — took 42% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Tina Zakahi / Elisabeth Frerichs
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with KATHARINE MIYATA-HIGA
+0.003about as expected — took 40% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Kwok
0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with KATHARINE MIYATA-HIGA
0.014below expectation — took 47% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joelle Tweit
0.028below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joelle Tweit
+0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheri Borden
+0.003about as expected — took 52% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheri Borden
+0.013better than expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Jennifer Howe / Maiko Winkler Chin
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geraldine Carlos
0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-01-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chantal Tran
0.052below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.