← Search

Jennifer Booth

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
81 matches · 54W–27L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
133 of 256
WA · 3.5
546 of 1209

Jennifer is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jennifer has gone from the 71st to the 96th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
78.1%
25W–7L · 64.5% of games
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 60.3% of games
7.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 62.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katrina Lau
+0.010better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Myrna Alquiza
+0.003about as expected — took 43% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
Hien Nguyen / Anabela Torrealba
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Pham
+0.018better than expected — took 55% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
Amy Hsu / Jingjing Cai
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chantal Tran
+0.034better than expected — took 40% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Cameron Ferguson / Francesca Sheppard
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chantal Tran
−0.046below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Menchaca
+0.022better than expected — took 100% of games against 74% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geraldine Carlos
−0.033below expectation — took 41% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-01-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annabelle Lucena
−0.010about as expected — took 59% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Amy Quilter / Karen Berlin
2026-01-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Carroll
+0.006about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-01-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with KATHARINE MIYATA-HIGA
+0.004about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Maggie Smith / Derek Edmondsmixed
2025-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Tom
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 54% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Spencer Addicott / Kathy Redmanmixed
2025-10-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roy Higashi
+0.000below expectation — took 53% of games against 71% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.