← Search

Annabelle Lucena

Auburn, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
60 matches · 33W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.22
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Auburn · 3.5
5 of 8
WA · 3.5
802 of 1209

Annabelle is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Annabelle has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Annabelle has gone from the 43rd to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
52.9%
18W–16L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 53.6% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
W
Jessica Zhi / Hedi Carpenter
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chantal Tran
+0.058better than expected — took 86% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Thara Veeramachaneni
2026-05-17 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.034below expectation — took 35% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 5-4
W
Amy Allen
2026-02-07 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.041better than expected — took 64% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 3-1
W
2026-01-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Booth
−0.010about as expected — took 59% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Ryu
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Ok Clark / Richard Clarkmixed
2025-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Leonardson
+0.000below expectation — took 53% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edwin Carlos Sr
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-06-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Topping
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Kay Coghlan / Kiera Kim
2025-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alma Estioco
−0.028below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-05-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Pusztai
−0.009below expectation — took 39% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Mary Smith / Naoko Umeda
2025-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nari Benson
+0.026better than expected — took 62% of games against 49% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Pusztai
+0.010better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.