Search

Alma Estioco

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
87 matches · 36W–51L · seasons 20192025
Where Alma sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Alma is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alma has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5201920202021202220242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Alma has gone from the 49th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
47.8%
22W–24L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 45.4% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
7W–14L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history87 matches
L
Kay Coghlan / Kiera Kim
2025-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annabelle Lucena
0.028below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chantal Tran
0.015below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Florence Kim / Lesley Yuasa
2025-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Padilla
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Devita
0.047below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-12-13 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Leonardson
+0.010about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Leonardson
+0.000below expectation — took 62% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Jeff Da / Tram Buimixed
2024-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Hernandez
+0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-09-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Hernandez
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 59% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Ann Strueby
0.014below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Sheryll Tan
+0.002about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Kristen Taylor / Becka Parker
2024-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Lockett
0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2024-03-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annabelle Lucena
+0.018better than expected — took 100% of games against 76% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.