Search

Jocelyn Devita

Gig Harbor, WA
3.5A year-end 2025
116 matches · 39W–77L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
36%
down to 3.0
64%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 21% down · 79% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.06. Higher than today’s 3.03 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Gig Harbor · 3.5
12 of 14
WA · 3.5
1186 of 1209

Jocelyn is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jocelyn has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Jocelyn has gone from the 3rd to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
43.8%
28W–36L · 49.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 29.6% of games
7.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 48.2% of games
8.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 35% of games
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 32.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history116 matches
L
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vicki Seaman
+0.014about as expected — took 25% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Karen Walker / John Walkermixed
2026-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Boggess
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with DAVID BENSON
+0.000below expectation — took 40% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Maison
0.013below expectation — took 0% of games against 22% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with MAIMAI BENSON
0.024below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vicki Seaman
+0.010about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vicki Seaman
+0.032about as expected — took 29% of games against 25% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Girvin
+0.021about as expected — took 20% of games against 23% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leslie Kinkade
+0.055better than expected — took 100% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Darran Hanson / Hong Vomixed
2025-08-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tony McLean
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eileen Pilcher
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vito Desantis
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 25% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.