← Search

Krista Philbrick

TACOMA, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
365 matches · 217W–148L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Krista Philbrick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history365 matches
L
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Misa Banks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Misa Banks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · Philbrick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misa Banks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · SWW-TLTC-Paul · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Richard Deitz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · Philbrick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misa Banks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · Philbrick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Riippi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · Philbrick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misa Banks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · SWW-TLTC-Paul · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andreas Ohrbeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-06-13 · JTC-Severns-Victorious Secret · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-05-03 · SWW-Philbrick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Mcnaughton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-05-03 · SWW-Philbrick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misa Banks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-26 · JTC-Severns-Victorious Secret · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beshka Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams95 teams · 2017–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
70%
21W–9L · 60.1% of games
4.0
60.4%
93W–61L · 55.1% of games
4.5
28.6%
8W–20L · 43.6% of games
3.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 60.2% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.2% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
54.3%
19W–16L · 53.5% of games
8.0mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 57.1% of games
9.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
163 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
60 matches
#1 Singles
15%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
52 matches
#2 Singles
5%
17 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams