← Search

Jill Gibson

Bremerton, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 53W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Gibson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
L
2026-08-01 · KTAC-Puckett · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Kidder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · KTAC-Puckett · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Kidder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · KTAC-Badar-Beach Bums · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tauseef Badar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-01 · Smashing Jack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chiyuki Sugimoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · Smashing Jack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Hedger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · KTAC-Badar-Beach Bums · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Gibson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · KTAC-Puckett · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Kidder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
Sara Simonson / Esther Kim
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Kim Hedger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-28 · Gibson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chiyuki Sugimoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-4
L
2025-07-12 · Gibson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chiyuki Sugimoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-09 · Gibson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-06-23 · Gibson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Hedger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
47.1%
32W–36L · 49.1% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.1% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer