← Search

Alicia Cole

Silverdale, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 82W–67L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Alicia Cole to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
W
2026-09-12 · KTAC-Lee-String Courtettes · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-04 · Smashing Jack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Hedger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · Smashing Jack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chiyuki Sugimoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · KTAC-Puckett · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carlos Itchon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · KTAC-Puckett · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Rapp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-07-13 · Smashing Jack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Hedger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-05 · KTAC-Puckett · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carlos Itchon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Chiyuki Sugimoto championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Chiyuki Sugimoto championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Chiyuki Sugimoto championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · KTAC-Farr-Honey Badgers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chiyuki Sugimoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-13 · KTAC-Farr-Honey Badgers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Hedger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
56.1%
32W–25L · 52.9% of games
7.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 61.7% of games
8.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 57.7% of games
7.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 45.5% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 53.9% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams