← Search

Kim Hedger

BREMERTON, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 78W–79L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Kim Hedger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
W
2026-09-12 · KTAC-Badar-Arashi · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Turner Hibbs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-04 · Smashing Jack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-26 · KTAC-Badar-Beach Bums · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tauseef Badar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · KTAC-Badar-Beach Bums · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Gibson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
David White / Misa Banks
2026-07-18 · KTAC-Badar-Beach Bums · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stu Teel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-13 · Smashing Jack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · Smashing Jack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-20 · Smashing Jack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chiyuki Sugimoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · KTAC-Farr-Honey Badgers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Letourneau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · KTAC-Farr-Honey Badgers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-23 · KTAC-Farr-Honey Badgers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-04-26 · KTAC-Farr-Honey Badgers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mayumi Barber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
56.6%
43W–33L · 51.4% of games
4.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 43% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
56.8%
21W–16L · 51.2% of games
9.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 36.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
20 matches
#1 Singles
6%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe