← Search

Richard Triquart

University Place, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
124 matches · 77W–47L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.40
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 29 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
89%
stay 3.5
11%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.35. Lower than today’s 3.40 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
University Place · 3.5
1 of 5
WA · 3.5
274 of 1209

Richard is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Richard has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Richard has gone from the 75th to the 82nd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.4% of games
3.5
60.4%
29W–19L · 56% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.9% of games
6.0mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 54.9% of games
7.0mixed
78.6%
22W–6L · 61.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history124 matches
W
Alicia Cole / John Rappmixed
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Heckman
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Jennifer Butler / Jeremy Pawloskimixed
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Heckman
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Carol Buckingham / McKee Buxtonmixed
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricia Parsons
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Angela Boice / Travis Wrightmixed
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Heckman
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Jillian Strayer / Jason Strayermixed
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Heckman
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Williamson
−0.005about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Heckman
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Hyoung Lee / Carter Smith
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rupesh Sansgiri
+0.002about as expected — took 62% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle Bowman
+0.025better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Vin Baylon / Adam Bien
2026-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle Bowman
+0.030better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Danny Severns / Anvesh Uppalapati
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Young Park
−0.006about as expected — took 47% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Laskowski
−0.006about as expected — took 46% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.