← Search

Tricia Parsons

Lakewood, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
71 matches · 36W–35L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.02
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
39%
stay 3.0
61%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 79% stay · 21% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.93. Lower than today’s 3.02 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
211 of 755

Tricia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tricia has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Tricia has gone from the 37th to the 71st percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
68%
17W–8L · 56.2% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Justin Hall
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Jennifer Weber / Vin Baylonmixed
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nathan Rettke
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Carol Buckingham / McKee Buxtonmixed
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Triquart
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clara Harig
+0.012about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reagan Wiltfong
−0.025below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Chinn
−0.023below expectation — took 54% of games against 63% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Lindsey Crahan / Alyssa Simm
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elena Belous
+0.036better than expected — took 35% of games against 27% expected
6-3, 5-3
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Costanti
+0.057better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Lauren Kennard / Dominique Mansilla Hermann
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Costanti
−0.010about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Hillman
−0.012below expectation — took 41% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maileen Walz
−0.033below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Nachiko Yamamoto / Jan Bradshaw
2026-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Costanti
+0.031better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.