← Search

Denise Costanti

Spanaway, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 72W–78L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Denise Costanti to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-07-12 · LRC-Barnes-Mixed Lobsters 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with JOHN COSTANTI mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Vicki Moll championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-13 · LRC-Costanti-Babes with Balls · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
W
N/A
2026-05-30 · LRC-Barnes-Mixed Lobsters 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with JOHN COSTANTI mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-24 · LRC-Costanti-Babes with Balls · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · LRC-Costanti-Babes with Balls · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · LRC-Costanti-Babes with Balls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tricia Parsons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-10 · LRC-Costanti-Babes with Balls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tricia Parsons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charae Hulburt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Sevey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-20 · LRC-Costanti-Babes with Balls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Hillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
47.5%
48W–53L · 50.1% of games
3.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 43.7% of games
6.0mixed
53.6%
15W–13L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
18 matches
#2 Singles
7%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams