← Search

Wendy Clarke

Puyallup, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
408 matches · 232W–176L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Wendy Clarke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history408 matches
W
2026-09-12 · GTC-Clarke-StayingAlive · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karin Mattson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Melissa Heckman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Melissa Heckman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-27 · TheOnes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Heckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · TheOnes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Heckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · TheOnes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Heckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · TheOnes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Heckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · TheOnes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Heckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Melissa Heckman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · TheOnes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Heckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · SWW-GTC-Dixon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Strayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-12 · SWW-GTC-Giske · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sue Spencer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
66.7%
30W–15L · 57.5% of games
3.5
62.7%
79W–47L · 55.5% of games
4.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.8% of games
6.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 55.1% of games
7.0
79.2%
42W–11L · 60.7% of games
8.0
28.6%
6W–15L · 44.6% of games
3.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 33.3% of games
6.0mixed
54.5%
12W–10L · 52.8% of games
7.0mixed
31.2%
10W–22L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
202 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
103 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
95 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Female Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal