← Search

Holly Brazel

Olympia, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
129 matches · 64W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.11
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
9%
down to 3.0
91%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 6% down · 94% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.12. Higher than today’s 3.11 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 3.5
39 of 47
WA · 3.5
1086 of 1209

Holly is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Holly has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Holly has gone from the 48th to the 36th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 56.8% of games
3.5
47.4%
37W–41L · 48.7% of games
6.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 59% of games
7.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 49.9% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history129 matches
L
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Lucenko
−0.028below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Sipe
−0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lacy Fehrenbach
−0.018below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Tiffany Washington / Pimwalan Churchill
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mi Ae Kim
−0.034below expectation — took 32% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hyo Han
+0.018better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Lucenko
−0.012about as expected — took 67% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Hunter
+0.013about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brianna Arboine
+0.017better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Kathy Loken / Sheila Berry
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Moody
−0.055below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Violet Clerget
+0.104better than expected — took 100% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Foley
+0.028better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
KuiCha Davison / Kathy Loken
2026-03-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Foley
−0.032below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.