← Search

Sheila Berry

Spanaway, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
272 matches · 142W–130L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Sheila Berry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history272 matches
L
2026-09-12 · LRC-Hudson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave McDonald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · STC-Berry-Sprinker OG's 40+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Mattson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-25 · STC-Berry-Sprinker OG's 40+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Mattson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · STC-Berry-Sprinker OG's 40+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sam Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · STC-Berry-Sprinker OG's 40+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Mattson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Elizabeth Sevey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-19 · STC-Berry-Sprinker OG's 40+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mart Salvino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-14 · STC-Berry-Sprinker OG's 40+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Camilo Sealey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-06 · STC-Berry-Sprinker OG's 40+ · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Mattson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-16 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Sevey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-03 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Loken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
70.7%
65W–27L · 57% of games
4.0
29.7%
11W–26L · 42.5% of games
3.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 33.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
58.2%
39W–28L · 51.3% of games
8.0mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
129 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
47 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer