← Search

Chino Mclaughlin

Tacoma, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
310 matches · 162W–148L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Tacoma · 3.5
37 of 65
WA · 3.5
892 of 1209

Chino is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chino has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Chino has gone from the 35th to the 60th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
56%
79W–62L · 53.1% of games
4.0
25.6%
11W–32L · 39.7% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 61.9% of games
7.0mixed
66%
33W–17L · 58.2% of games
8.0mixed
51.7%
15W–14L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history310 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Pawloski
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Monica Ghambari / Marco Esquivelmixed
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Pawloski
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Kris Furrer / Kryzhia Jaide Baluca
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda O'Halloran
+0.036better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Troy Kelley
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda O'Halloran
−0.006about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Caroline Thompson / Kelly Barrett
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda O'Halloran
−0.009about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Troy Kelley
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Sievkheng Ly / Emily Claflin
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Corddry
−0.010about as expected — took 67% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Tracy Luong / Nga Nguyen
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maura Nealon
+0.002better than expected — took 72% of games against 65% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Kalmbach
+0.018better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-04 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda O'Halloran
−0.007below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.