Search

Kris Furrer

Gig Harbor, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
121 matches · 80W–41L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.15
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 46 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
3%
stay 3.0
97%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 35% stay · 65% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.03. Lower than today’s 3.15 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Gig Harbor · 3.0
2 of 10
WA · 3.0
50 of 755

Kris is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kris has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Kris has gone from the 79th to the 86th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
93.3%
14W–1L · 71.7% of games
3.0
68.3%
43W–20L · 58.3% of games
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 48.8% of games
6.0mixed
51.7%
15W–14L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history121 matches
W
Scott Fox / Jillian Mcqueenchamps
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Gavin Cochran
+0.016better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Anthony Jackson
+0.031better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Mi Ae Kim
2026-06-13 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.035below expectation — took 50% of games against 64% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clara Harig
+0.060better than expected — took 75% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Abelyn Encarnacion
2026-05-23 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.046below expectation — took 60% of games against 73% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fiona Laird
0.076below expectation — took 20% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Holien
+0.030better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kryzhia Jaide Baluca
0.036below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Carl Paulino / Deanne Griffithsmixed
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ken Tobias
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clara Harig
0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Marston
0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.022below expectation — took 59% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.