← Search

Debby Sigel

University Place, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 34W–46L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Debby Sigel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-09-13 · LRC-Worthen · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kris Furrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-11-22 · LRC-Baird · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aaron Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-16 · LRC-Baird · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aaron Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-28 · LRC-Moll-Lakewood Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Tilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-02 · LRC-Baird/Hulburt-Panic at the Baseline · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sam Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-19 · LRC-Baird/Hulburt-Panic at the Baseline · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ken Enslow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-05 · LRC-Baird/Hulburt-Panic at the Baseline · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ken Enslow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-14 · LRC-Ward-Babes With Balls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thida Vongvilay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-08 · LRC-Ward-Babes With Balls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Worthen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-05-31 · LRC-Ward-Babes With Balls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Connie Worthen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-04-27 · LRC-Ward-Babes With Balls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maileen Walz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-04-26 · LRC-Ward-Babes With Balls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Chinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
55%
11W–9L · 49.9% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
53.8%
14W–12L · 49.3% of games
7.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 45.7% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 22.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova