← Search

Connie Worthen

Gig Harbor, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
158 matches · 54W–104L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Gig Harbor · 3.0
10 of 10
WA · 3.0
542 of 755

Connie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Connie has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Connie has gone from the 29th to the 25th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
29.7%
19W–45L · 42.9% of games
6.0
44.7%
17W–21L · 50.3% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 49.3% of games
6.0mixed
31%
13W–29L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history158 matches
L
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teena Ward
−0.007below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Hutchison
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sam Barnes
+0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Kristin Coovert / Virgie Lacanlale
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Chinn
−0.008below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Costanti
−0.014below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Nachiko Yamamoto / Erin Fischer
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teena Ward
−0.022below expectation — took 48% of games against 56% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Merilee Tanbara / Shane Crookmixed
2026-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Gonzalez
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Chinn
−0.020below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sam Barnes
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Kenmir
+0.017better than expected — took 44% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Adriana Zamora / Vallerie Thoms
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Kenmir
+0.035better than expected — took 61% of games against 45% expected
5-7, 6-0
L
2026-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maileen Walz
−0.030below expectation — took 35% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.