Search

Mike Rasanen

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
166 matches · 78W–88L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.95
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 26 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
73%
stay 3.0
27%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 93% stay · 7% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.88. Lower than today’s 2.95 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
29 of 63
WA · 3.0
339 of 755

Mike is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mike has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Mike has gone from the 86th to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 62.2% of games
3.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 47.2% of games
6.0
65%
26W–14L · 55.8% of games
7.0
16.7%
5W–25L · 39.4% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
15W–6L · 57.2% of games
7.0mixed
16%
4W–21L · 36.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history166 matches
L
MARK MILLER / Tom Weeksmixedchamps
2026-06-15 · #2 Doubles · with Mike Rayburn
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Brian Nelson / Rich Schlachter
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew McCormick
0.014below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Tom Parma / David Casebier
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Fauchald
0.023below expectation — took 58% of games against 65% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dick Lunceford
+0.057better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Douglas Mclennan / Bruce Ballon
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Abraham
0.045below expectation — took 44% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Carlos Itchon / John Rapp
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Boggess
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Geoff Lieberman / Rick Downey
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Roma
+0.013better than expected — took 54% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Fauchald
+0.016better than expected — took 80% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Kim Smith / Douglas Mclennan
2026-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Rayburn
+0.010better than expected — took 72% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
David Gano / Violet Clergetmixed
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Rasanen
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Doug Hungerford / Steve Lien
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Boggess
+0.014better than expected — took 68% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rick Hecks
+0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.