← Search

Michael Boggess

Olympia, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
120 matches · 69W–51L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.94
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
77%
stay 3.0
23%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.87. Lower than today’s 2.94 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 3.0
20 of 41
WA · 3.0
359 of 755

Michael is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202020242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Michael has gone from the 97th to the 27th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
71.4%
20W–8L · 61.2% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 33.3% of games
6.0
68.8%
22W–10L · 56.2% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.8% of games
6.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 63.3% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Chan
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Carlos Itchon / John Rapp
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roger Hebert
+0.002about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Carlos Itchon / John Rapp
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Rasanen
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Selina Lai
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Chan
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Doug Hungerford / Steve Lien
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Rasanen
+0.014better than expected — took 68% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Stumpf
+0.013better than expected — took 46% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Selina Lai
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Leslie Engelhard / Noel Panilagaomixed
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Loreal ARGYLE
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Selina Lai
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Masami Hasegawa / Mike Montplaisir
2026-04-09 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rick Hecks
+0.086better than expected — took 92% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Karen Walker / John Walkermixed
2026-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jocelyn Devita
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.