← Search

Julie Peters

Olympia, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
154 matches · 87W–67L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.01
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 34 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
46%
stay 3.0
54%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 83% stay · 17% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.92. Lower than today’s 3.01 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 3.0
8 of 41
WA · 3.0
231 of 755

Julie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Julie has gone from the 83rd to the 91st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
67.8%
40W–19L · 59.2% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.4% of games
6.0
64.5%
20W–11L · 57.2% of games
7.0
25%
3W–9L · 42.3% of games
6.0mixed
44.8%
13W–16L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history154 matches
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Gentzler
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzana Bulatovic
−0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 45% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Peters
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marny Howell
+0.035better than expected — took 100% of games against 70% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lacy Fehrenbach
+0.049better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Stagnone
+0.064better than expected — took 100% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Michael Boggess / Selina Laimixed
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Morta
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lacy Fehrenbach
−0.004about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Liz VanDerschelden / Jim Rileymixed
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Peters
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Stagnone
−0.050below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lacy Fehrenbach
+0.019better than expected — took 56% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Stagnone
−0.020about as expected — took 75% of games against 74% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.