Search

Jill Nielson

Winlock, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
42 matches · 4W–38L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.55
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
26%
down to 2.5
74%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 15% down · 85% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.58. Higher than today’s 2.55 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
748 of 755

Jill is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jill has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jill has gone from the 0th to the 2nd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.0
9.5%
4W–38L · 34.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history42 matches
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Bradshaw
0.005below expectation — took 14% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Bradshaw
+0.023better than expected — took 46% of games against 37% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Laura King / Alison Ambauen
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Denton
0.021below expectation — took 8% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Leslie Artman / Kristina Maritczak
2026-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Denton
+0.033better than expected — took 47% of games against 35% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Bradshaw
0.021below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Aija Seay / Mi Ae Kim
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Denton
+0.047better than expected — took 42% of games against 28% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Bradshaw
+0.020about as expected — took 25% of games against 27% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Bradshaw
0.044below expectation — took 8% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Denton
+0.020about as expected — took 25% of games against 26% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Chris Stewart / Melanie Johnson
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Bradshaw
0.063below expectation — took 0% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Marie Stedham
+0.007below expectation — took 14% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Denton
+0.032better than expected — took 33% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.