Search

Aija Seay

Lacey, WA
3.0C year-end 2023
67 matches · 38W–29L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
586 of 755

Aija is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Aija has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Aija has gone from the 57th to the 83rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games
3.0
64.4%
29W–16L · 58.2% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 56.2% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history67 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marny Howell
+0.012better than expected — took 100% of games against 78% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
MaryEllen Atkinson / Shannon Suchland
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mi Ae Kim
+0.016better than expected — took 92% of games against 72% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marny Howell
0.008below expectation — took 38% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Samara Laynor / Andrea Nye
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mi Ae Kim
0.017about as expected — took 71% of games against 70% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Grippo
+0.024better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Brooklynn Lowe / Laurie Corwin
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Capestany
0.028below expectation — took 45% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Annie Fanberg / Melinda Fohn
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lacy Fehrenbach
+0.006better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mi Ae Kim
0.047below expectation — took 58% of games against 72% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Gentzler
+0.065better than expected — took 100% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Lisa Rehberger / Morgan Steele
2025-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mi Ae Kim
+0.016better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-01-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mi Ae Kim
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-12-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vichet Hoy
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.