Teams

Kim/Seay-Smash Squad

2026 One Doubles-Winter · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-29vs Artman-Dream TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesHyo Han / Mi Ae Kim vs Theanne Sandbo / Anneliese Johnson7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-18vs Nielson-LCTA Jill & CoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAija Seay / Mi Ae Kim vs Jill Nielson / Lori Denton4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Smith (Winter)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMi Ae Kim / Marny Howell vs Anne Bennett / Shanan Hedges6-4, 6-3
2026-03-25vs PetersWon 10
W#1 DoublesViolet Clerget / Marny Howell vs Julie Nierenberg / Ellen Stagnone6-0, 6-2
2026-02-28vs Lisa/MollyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarny Howell / Hyo Han vs Elena Belous / Lindy Mense6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-16vs Nielson-LCTA Jill & CoWon 10
W#1 DoublesViolet Clerget / Marny Howell vs Jill Nielson / Jan Bradshaw6-1, 6-2
2026-02-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMi Ae Kim / Denise Gentzler vs Lucy Davis / Laura King6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-02-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesViolet Clerget / Hyo Han vs Lisa Smith / Anne Bennett6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Violet Clerget
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Mi Ae Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Marny Howell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Denise Gentzler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Aija Seay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Hyo Han
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Violet Clerget + Marny Howell4165% games+16.4% vs expected
Mi Ae Kim + Hyo Han10157% games+6.4% vs expected
Denise Gentzler + Hyo Han7358% games+5.1% vs expected
Aija Seay + Mi Ae Kim11360% games+4.2% vs expected
Violet Clerget + Hyo Han5453% games+0.4% vs expected
Mi Ae Kim + Marny Howell404 matchesnot enough data
Mi Ae Kim + Denise Gentzler033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Violet Clerget
160W–130L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Mi Ae Kim
70W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Marny Howell
29W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Denise Gentzler
46W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Aija Seay
38W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Hyo Han
61W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.