← Search

Melinda Fohn

Poulsbo, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 29W–34L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Melinda Fohn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-07-18 · KTAC-Fohn-Midcourt Crisis · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kevin Wyant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · KTAC-Fohn-Midcourt Crisis · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dustin Jensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-23 · KTAC-Mense · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · KTAC-Mense · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · KTAC-Wyant-The Why Nots · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kevin Wyant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · KTAC-Mense · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Fanberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-17 · KTAC-Mense · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kali Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-04 · KTAC-Wyant-The Why Nots · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kenneth Kidder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-28 · KTAC-Mense · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vanessa Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-03-22 · KTAC-Wyant-The Why Nots · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kevin Wyant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-14 · KTAC-Engelhard-KitCats · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-28 · KTAC-Engelhard-KitCats · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
33.3%
11W–22L · 45.5% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe