Search

Julie Quesada

Tacoma, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
77 matches · 27W–50L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Tacoma · 3.0
41 of 49
WA · 3.0
624 of 755

Julie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Julie has gone from the 3rd to the 34th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
39%
23W–36L · 46.4% of games
6.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.3% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 29% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Danny Herbst
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 42% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danny Herbst
+0.000about as expected — took 25% of games against 24% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Avila
0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Nemetz
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Laura King / Caitlyn McDonald
2026-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karina Spellman
0.041below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Stockstad
0.018below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Stacie Nemetz
0.026below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Laura King / Lauren Trelevenchamps
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Stacie Nemetz
+0.018better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Melinda Rowan / Bronwyn Rogers
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacie Nemetz
0.060below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Vanessa Carlson / Kelsie Miller
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacie Nemetz
+0.017better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Elizabeth McDougall / Lauren Treleven
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karina Spellman
0.024below expectation — took 28% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacie Nemetz
0.004about as expected — took 43% of games against 47% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.