Teams

Nemetz/Stockstad-Court Queens

2026 One Doubles-Winter · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-01vs Howard/FurrerLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacie Nemetz / Karina Spellman vs Danielle Marston / Kris Furrer3-6, 4-6
2026-04-27vs TMJLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacie Nemetz / Karina Spellman vs Michelle Filomeo / Tashi Schmidt4-6, 2-6
2026-04-27vs Amy WhiteLost 01
L#1 DoublesTeresa Avila / Julie Quesada vs Amy White / Julie Templin3-6, 4-6
2026-03-15vs Chappelka/Holien-Ball BustersLost 01
L#1 DoublesTeresa Avila / Karina Spellman vs Ellen Chappelka / Dominique Mansilla Hermann2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-03vs Katja WhiteWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Quesada / Karina Spellman vs Katja White / Thuy Chapin6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesJennifer Stockstad / Stacie Nemetz vs Caroline Thompson / Breanne Sayah7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Teresa Avila
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Jennifer Stockstad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Stacie Nemetz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Julie Quesada
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Karina Spellman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacie Nemetz + Jennifer Stockstad3357% games+6.3% vs expected
Stacie Nemetz + Teresa Avila9656% games+5.0% vs expected
Jennifer Stockstad + Julie Quesada4651% games+2.7% vs expected
Teresa Avila + Karina Spellman2347% games−3.6% vs expected
Stacie Nemetz + Karina Spellman2640% games−3.7% vs expected
Stacie Nemetz + Julie Quesada101645% games−3.9% vs expected
Julie Quesada + Karina Spellman2443% games−7.1% vs expected
Teresa Avila + Julie Quesada033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Teresa Avila
36W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Jennifer Stockstad
21W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Stacie Nemetz
53W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Julie Quesada
27W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Karina Spellman
31W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.