Teams

Pawlitschek/Strayer-Brad's Caffeinated Squirrels

2026 One Doubles-Winter · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-19vs Chappelka/Holien-Ball BustersWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaya Pawlitschek / Jillian Strayer vs Ellen Chappelka / Dominique Mansilla Hermann6-1, 7-6
2026-04-16vs TMJLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaya Pawlitschek / Breanne Sayah vs Jaime Brucker / Tashi Schmidt2-6, 0-6
2026-04-13vs Chappelka/Holien-Ball BustersWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Thompson / Jennifer Weber vs Vicky Dinh / Dominique Mansilla Hermann6-1, 6-1
2026-03-28vs Fischer/Batsel-Alley CatsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJillian Strayer / Jennifer Weber vs Erin Fischer / Heather Akiyama6-2, 6-1
2026-03-23vs Katja WhiteWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Weber / Maya Pawlitschek vs Katja White / Thuy Chapin6-0, 6-4
2026-03-05vs Amy WhiteLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Thompson / Maya Pawlitschek vs Julie Templin / Amy White6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-24vs Nemetz/Stockstad-Court QueensWon 10
W#1 DoublesCaroline Thompson / Breanne Sayah vs Jennifer Stockstad / Stacie Nemetz7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-23vs Howard/FurrerWon 10
W#1 DoublesJillian Strayer / Breanne Sayah vs Danielle Marston / Anna Howard6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Maya Pawlitschek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Breanne Sayah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Jillian Strayer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Caroline Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Jennifer Weber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Weber + Breanne Sayah3360% games+12.4% vs expected
Jennifer Weber + Maya Pawlitschek2647% games+3.0% vs expected
Breanne Sayah + Maya Pawlitschek4359% games+1.7% vs expected
Jillian Strayer + Maya Pawlitschek241354% games+1.5% vs expected
Jennifer Weber + Jillian Strayer4256% games+0.5% vs expected
Breanne Sayah + Jillian Strayer314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Weber + Caroline Thompson303 matchesnot enough data
Breanne Sayah + Caroline Thompson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Maya Pawlitschek
49W–53L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Breanne Sayah
39W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Jillian Strayer
62W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Caroline Thompson
29W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Jennifer Weber
52W–69L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.