← Search

Anna Howard

Tacoma, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 76W–19L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Anna Howard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-09-13 · GTC-Belous-Mighty Marmots 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ross Eastman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Violet Clerget / Hyo Han
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Elena Belous championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Laila Bush championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with April Victor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with April Victor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Howard · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · Howard · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-10 · Howard · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · Howard · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · Spin Squad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Victor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · SWW-Belous · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elena Belous
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-3
W
2026-07-19 · Spin Squad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Corinne Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
93.8%
15W–1L · 72.5% of games
3.0
81.1%
43W–10L · 63% of games
3.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 63.2% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 68.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
50 matches
#1 Singles
28%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer