← Search

Nicki Kristol

UNIVERSITY PLACE, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
13 matches · 6W–7L · seasons 2026–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.5
887 of 1624

Nicki is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history13 matches
L
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Strayer
−0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Milligan
+0.030better than expected — took 47% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Milligan
−0.065below expectation — took 20% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Strayer
+0.007about as expected — took 42% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Milligan
−0.017below expectation — took 54% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Stevenson
−0.022below expectation — took 59% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-11 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.058better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-10 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.017about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-22 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.032better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-21 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.034below expectation — took 50% of games against 64% expected
5-7, 5-3
L
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Gerritzen
−0.008below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Rachel Claflin
2026-01-24 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.