← Search

Maileen Walz

Puyallup, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
245 matches · 83W–162L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Maileen Walz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history245 matches
W
2026-09-13 · JTC-VanDerschelden-BobbleHeads · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Dymarkowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-12 · GTC-Chan-Flying Eagles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vickie Mercer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-24 · Maileen · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-13 · Maileen · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · BETC-Schiller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dinesh Mandalapu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-02 · Eastern Spin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sachiko Urano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-30 · Maileen · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-18 · BETC-Schiller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eugene Guber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-15 · Eastern Spin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwayoung Srein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · BETC-Schiller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Topping mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-22 · Maileen · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-20 · LRC-Barnes-Mixed Lobsters 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sam Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 47.9% of games
3.0
33.9%
41W–80L · 44.3% of games
3.5
6.2%
3W–45L · 29.1% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
53.5%
23W–20L · 53.4% of games
7.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
36 matches
#2 Singles
5%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova