Search

Ellen Johnson

Shoreline, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
148 matches · 90W–58L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.45
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
75%
stay 3.5
25%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.38. Lower than today’s 3.45 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Shoreline · 3.5
1 of 22
WA · 3.5
174 of 1209

Ellen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ellen has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Ellen has gone from the 73rd to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
100%
16W–0L · 69.6% of games
3.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 47.8% of games
7.0
64.4%
38W–21L · 55.3% of games
8.0
30.4%
7W–16L · 44.6% of games
7.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history148 matches
L
Charlie Hsu / Danica Knievelmixed
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Liner
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Eva Chen / Akram Husseinmixed
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Damian Gibbs
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 59% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sara Kuhl
+0.078better than expected — took 86% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Burdyshaw
0.022below expectation — took 62% of games against 67% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Kuhl
0.078below expectation — took 0% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Tammy Alford / Karen Felton
2026-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Rea
+0.096better than expected — took 75% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheilah Clark
+0.043better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-10-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Francisca Lehr
+0.013about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Merri Baldwin / Ann Rae Smith
2025-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Hauer
+0.067better than expected — took 80% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Carrie Wallace / Susan James
2025-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Corliss Liekkio
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Corliss Liekkio
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-07-03 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Dorrie Johnson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.