← Search

Cory Jacobson

Lake Forest Park, WA
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
59 matches · 24W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cory Jacobson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-08-14 · HBSQ-Thompson · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Liz Smalley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-31 · HBSQ-Thompson · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Mary Dolan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-20 · HBSQ-Clark · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jolene Momcilovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-08 · HBSQ-Clark · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Burdyshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-06 · HBSQ-Clark · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jolene Momcilovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-21 · HBSQ-Thompson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Liz Smalley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-15 · HBSQ-Thompson · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Maurene Cronyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-18 · HBSQ-Thompson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan Chase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-07-10 · HBSQ-Thompson · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Carrie Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-05-28 · HBSQ-Tierney · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Liner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-05-19 · HBSQ-Tierney · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Chase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2024-08-13 · HBSQ-Thompson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan Chase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
50%
8W–8L · 46.2% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 51.9% of games
7.0
22.2%
4W–14L · 39.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova