← Search

Sandy Rudolph

Issaquah, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
78 matches · 30W–48L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.31
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Issaquah · 3.5
11 of 21
WA · 3.5
524 of 1209

Sandy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sandy has been 3.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sandy has gone from the 44th to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
0.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 61.6% of games
3.5
25%
8W–24L · 40.7% of games
7.0
37%
10W–17L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history78 matches
W
Claudia Diorio / Janet Mcinerney
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Judy Simmons
+0.052better than expected — took 86% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Heidi Broecking / Candy Doud
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Karen Felton
+0.013better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Rasanen
+0.011better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Miller
+0.006below expectation — took 20% of games against 28% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Christie Vandyke / Angela Wang
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Sypher
+0.007better than expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Johnson
−0.008below expectation — took 35% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Nona Allison / Mary Louise Sumioka
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Arnold
+0.030better than expected — took 42% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Simmons
−0.018below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Gwendolyn Emminger / Sara Wetstone
2026-02-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Friedman
−0.011below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Erin Logsdon / Savitha Krammer
2026-02-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ran Duan
−0.035below expectation — took 38% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Mindy Park / Sarah Barnes
2026-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Johnson
+0.019better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Stephanie Gauthier / Rebecca Feyerick
2026-01-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrienne Pierce
−0.026below expectation — took 46% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.