Search

Emily Arons

Redmond, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
68 matches · 36W–32L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.23
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Redmond · 3.5
28 of 43
WA · 3.5
785 of 1209

Emily is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Emily has gone from the 21st to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
100%
11W–0L · 57.3% of games
3.5
38.8%
19W–30L · 48.7% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 56% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history68 matches
L
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with TERRIE LUQUETTE
+0.010better than expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Rutchel Lois Abella / Michelle Clark
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with TERRIE LUQUETTE
+0.019better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Karen Walker / Rebecca Whitlock
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Semak
0.022below expectation — took 55% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
Carla Johnson / Sandy Rudolph
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara James
+0.008better than expected — took 65% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with TERRIE LUQUETTE
0.044below expectation — took 33% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Waid Louie / Shannen Wyman
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with TERRIE LUQUETTE
+0.047better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Mieko Okabe / Emily Greenspahn
2026-03-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yoshimi Gershaw
0.046below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Shannon Corbett / Susan Sodorff
2026-02-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Semak
0.055below expectation — took 29% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Sarah Trester / Ingrid Foster
2026-02-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lin Han
+0.002about as expected — took 39% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 4-2
W
2026-02-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lin Han
+0.013better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-12-07 · #1 Doubles · with Petra Carl
+0.027about as expected — took 33% of games against 29% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Skorupa
+0.042better than expected — took 92% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.