← Search

Mieko Okabe

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 54W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mieko Okabe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
N/A
2026-08-09 · EDG-Ace, Ace Baby-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kolt Kaneshiro mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · EDG-Ace, Ace Baby-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kolt Kaneshiro mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-2
L
2026-07-19 · EDG-Mavericks-Gliner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Allan Yeung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · EDG-Mavericks-Gliner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jinhong No mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-23 · EDG-Brennock · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaori Yamada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-16 · EDG-Brennock · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · EDG-Brennock · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-12 · EDG (Daytime) Brennock · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Greenspahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-05 · EDG (Daytime) Brennock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Closson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-02-19 · EDG (Daytime) Brennock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Brennock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-13 · EDG (Daytime) Brennock · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deirdre Chiu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-02-06 · EDG (Daytime) Brennock · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 63.8% of games
3.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 54.1% of games
6.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 55.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
13 matches
#1 Singles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer