← Search

Jinhong No

Issaquah, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
144 matches · 95W–49L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.38
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
93%
stay 3.5
7%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.33. Lower than today’s 3.38 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Issaquah · 3.5
9 of 21
WA · 3.5
336 of 1209

Jinhong is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jinhong has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jinhong has gone from the 57th to the 71st percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
81.5%
22W–5L · 61% of games
3.5
66.1%
37W–19L · 56.3% of games
6.0mixed
61.1%
22W–14L · 54.7% of games
7.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 63.1% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history144 matches
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gunjan Tykodi
+0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shauna Forster
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mieko Okabe
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Mark Litton / Aki Tamelingmixed
2026-07-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Seungwon Lee
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gunjan Tykodi
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Rebecca Zimmer / Jon Kawaguchimixed
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Seungwon Lee
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shobhit Singh
−0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Ravi Vyas
2026-05-15 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.037below expectation — took 43% of games against 58% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Divakaran Jeyachandran
2026-05-10 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.011better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
David Jacob / Hilario Koyama
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ranjit Prabhu
+0.007about as expected — took 52% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.031better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Imad Sheriff
2026-04-04 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.