← Search

Sandrio Elim

Bothell, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 117W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sandrio Elim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
L
2026-07-11 · NWW-WSC-Wang · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lindsay Terpstra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-05 · NWW-WSC-Wang · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Xiaoyi Ye mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Munish Vashist championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · TUK-4Aces-Wang · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-03 · TUK-4Aces-Wang · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Stetter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-24 · TUK-4Aces-Wang · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Munish Vashist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-10 · TUK-4Aces-Wang · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Munish Vashist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-3
W
2026-03-08 · WSC-4Aces-Wang · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Lam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-03-01 · WSC-4Aces-Wang · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-07 · WSC-4Aces-Wang · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tian Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-24 · WSC-4Aces-Wang · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Stetter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-11 · WSC-4Aces-Wang · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mohinder Singh Atwal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
68.1%
32W–15L · 55.7% of games
3.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.4% of games
6.0mixed
80.5%
33W–8L · 63.7% of games
7.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 61.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
28 matches
#1 Singles
12%
19 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal