Search

Kimberly Skorupa

Kirkland, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
270 matches · 132W–138L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.55
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 35 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
28%
down to 3.5
72%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 16% down · 84% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.58. Higher than today’s 3.55 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 4.0
28 of 32
WA · 4.0
660 of 782

Kimberly is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams155 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kimberly has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kimberly has gone from the 76th to the 32nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
4.0
50.5%
55W–54L · 50.6% of games
4.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 47.3% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 53.3% of games
8.0
58.5%
24W–17L · 50.8% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.2% of games
9.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.9% of games
8.0mixed
44.2%
19W–24L · 47% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history270 matches
L
Emiko Way / Steve Hsiaomixed
2026-07-24 · CP-Bouton · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tony Balkan
+0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · Desert Friends-Skorupa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather McKay
0.089below expectation — took 0% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-22 · Desert Friends-Skorupa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allyson Marks
+0.001about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Shirley Chow / Douglas Beckmixed
2026-07-12 · CP-Bouton · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tony Balkan
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-08 · Doubles Sunshine-Chen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leah Gray
0.039below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-27 · CP (Daytime) Causin' a Racquet-Laun · #1 Doubles · with Susie Heimdahl
+0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · CP (Daytime) Causin' a Racquet-Laun · #1 Doubles · with Susie Heimdahl
+0.022better than expected — took 57% of games against 47% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Doubles Sunshine-Chen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Chen
+0.006about as expected — took 55% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · Desert Friends-Skorupa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mistie Iseman
0.010about as expected — took 58% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Monica McCready / Joan Hall
2026-04-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mistie Iseman
0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Jessica Berkovitz / Tracy Woodward
2026-04-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allyson Marks
+0.031better than expected — took 60% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Karen Vidal / Robin Lazarow
2026-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mistie Iseman
0.026below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.