Search

Mindy Blakeslee

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
120 matches · 80W–40L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.27
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 4.0
100%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.5
18 of 103
WA · 4.5
49 of 364

Mindy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams61 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mindy has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

4.04.55.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Mindy has gone from the 45th to the 99th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.5
71.4%
30W–12L · 58.5% of games
5.0
30%
3W–7L · 42% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
80%
8W–2L · 62.4% of games
10.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 62.6% of games
9.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 65.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-07-12 · STC-Suver · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Ebel
+0.000below expectation — took 57% of games against 64% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · women · #3 Doubles · with Lisa Black
+0.011better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 1-2
W
2026-06-27 · women · #1 Doubles · with Dayna Guizzetti
0.001about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · women · #1 Doubles · with Dayna Guizzetti
0.010about as expected — took 59% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-26 · women · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Black
0.034below expectation — took 65% of games against 72% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-20 · STC-Suver · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephen Rosen
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Colby White / Melissa Colechamps
2026-03-14 · NWW-STC-Wise · #2 Doubles · with Kevin Young
+0.038better than expected — took 38% of games against 28% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Steve Pittman / Tamara Simonechamps
2026-03-14 · NWW-STC-Wise · #2 Doubles · with Kevin Young
+0.030better than expected — took 37% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Sharon Runk / Nelson Vale Perezchamps
2026-03-13 · NWW-STC-Wise · #1 Doubles · with Eric Freeman
0.045below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-28 · STC-Suver · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Black
+0.005about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-01 · STC-Suver · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liz Suver
+0.032better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-01-10 · STC-Suver · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Black
0.028below expectation — took 45% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 4-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.